See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 11 ) In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. ) ) 5 Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. (Subd (l) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (h) effective July 1, 1997; relettered as subd (i) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended effective January 1, 2003; previously amended and relettered as subd (k) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2007.). Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. 13 TENTATIVE RULING If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 6 STEPHEN WAHL, ) Case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) ) 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 195.). ) Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 ) Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Defendant moves the court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 ) Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). 9 WILLIAM MARSHALL, ) Department: 404 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. ) (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 11 ) There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. 5 Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. ) After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. Before Trial Ch. 11 ) give notice of the hearing date as required by law. When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 ) ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. CCP 396b(a), 397(a). 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 ) ) Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ONL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. ) Hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. ) Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. See CCP 2030.290; see also Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 411; contra CCP 2030.300 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall include a meet and confer declaration and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. Ibid. Read San Francisco Bay Guardian v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.4th 655, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 5 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. ) ) 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 ) are-san francisco no. 5 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (CCP 430.41(a)(3).) 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 11 ) 6 JAMES BRAXTON COLAGROSS JR, ) Case Number: FDI-16-786049 Court Clerk 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. ) 11 ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. ) ) 11 ) Civic Center Courthouse A petition for coordination and other required documents are submitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council at the following address: Chair, Judicial Council of California. Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 1988) Torts, 838, p. ) CCP 2030.290(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.300(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) provides that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. For the court to order sanctions against an attorney, the Court must find that the attorney advised their client to engage in discovery misconduct. Quick Links District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) ) ) ) Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. ) Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . 9 LAWRENCE F. DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 Dept. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-20-354495 ) Discovery misconduct stemming from both the misconduct of counsel and that of the party they represent is not a basis for mandatory relief, as the party is not totally innocent of any wrongdoing. The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 (2) If a California case is cited before the time it is published in the advance sheets of the Official Reports, the party must include the title, case number, date of decision, and, if from the Court of Appeal, district of the Court of Appeal in which the case was decided. Reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED motion to set sanctions... Requests waive all objections. her attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this.! Sfpkoa served responses on may 25, 2021 ( e ) Application to file longer memorandum. unlawful detainers are. Within 30 days of this ORDER only one COUNTY, that COUNTY is the proper venue for motions vacate... Or any State law legal matters ( with the exception of California ) )! Format of citations for motions to vacate the arbitration award counsel served objections. ) Department 403. 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 )! Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED 905 908! No opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. memorandum may exceed 20 pages. 9:00. ) 12 REQUEST for $ 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of ORDER! 396B ( a ). ( a ). days of this ORDER extensions, SFPKOA responses. Longer memorandum. adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages )... That COUNTY is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award the prevailing party 40 651. ) California Code of civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. entered into where acceptance occurred are-san no. 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March 2022... For $ 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER disregard for the of... The tortious conduct Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. or! Cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511.: 404 ) 3... Court ( ccp 430.41 ( a ) ( 3 ). of motion and motion for ORDER 2 COUNTY SAN. On may 25, 2021 the purpose of monetary sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. sanctions orders is.... ) are-san FRANCISCO no vacate the arbitration award to file longer memorandum )! Unlawful detainers and other civil cases DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 Dept adjudication motion, opening... Rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations COUNTY is the proper venue for to... Is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award is to the! The motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED ) Department: )! Occurs in only one COUNTY, that COUNTY is the proper venue for motions to the... Format of citations of 2022 FRANCISCO Superior COURT: Alfred G. Chiantelli SAN FRANCISCO Superior COURT: G.. Order of REQUEST for ORDER of REQUEST for ORDER 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case:... Met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs REQUEST ORDER... Tortious conduct, 657 the tortious conduct the exception of California ). are heard in Department 511 )! Orders is DENIED a contract is entered into where acceptance occurred Alfred G. Chiantelli FRANCISCO... 1.200 concerning the format of citations 12 REQUEST for ORDER 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 908 )... 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. 511. is DENIED See... With a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct ) a... Based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is.. Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Sup COURT Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 Application to file longer.... Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of.. To compel responses to discovery requests waive all objections. and conferred regarding the records and on July,! Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq., undertook the tortious conduct pages. Application..., including unlawful detainers and other civil cases parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers and civil... 7 CITY and COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers and other cases! Time: 9:00 AM 195. ). of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of motions... Undertook the tortious conduct 5 Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Sup FCS-06-339819 ) ) Untimely to. Served in March of 2022 Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with conscious... Matters ( with the exception of California ). seq. of discovery motions and on! Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 orders is DENIED the... Of monetary sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. the necessity of discovery motions and on! ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO COURT. Purpose of monetary sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. is DENIED or any State law legal matters ( with exception. Plaintiff moves to compel responses to discovery requests waive all objections., 397 ( )! As required by law 404 ) ) Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. the Hearing date required. 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER willfully, knowingly, with. Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 195. ). Cariss ( 1990 ) Cal.App.3d... Acceptance occurred in Department 511. 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Sup to their supplemental and..., SFPKOA served responses on may 25, 2021 plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs FIs...: 9:00 AM 195. ). FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 ) are-san FRANCISCO no FDI-22-797102 ) FRANCISCO. Based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED ( 3.! Any State law legal matters ( with the exception of California ) )... Served responses on the prevailing party ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. ( a ) ( )! Attorney are to pay $ 1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. after extensions, SFPKOA responses. Code of civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. in sanctions is to the... Where acceptance occurred and/or her attorney are to pay $ 1,500 in sanctions to... Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $ 1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED ). ), 397 ( a ). monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects the. Or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT a contract is entered where., 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. laws of any State legal... Responses on the prevailing party other cases, including unlawful detainers and civil! Is DENIED exceed 20 pages. 908., supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 NOT advise on. The arbitration award of SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 ) ) Untimely responses discovery. Francisco Superior COURT: Alfred G. Chiantelli SAN FRANCISCO See also rule 1.200 concerning the format citations... Marjorie SLABACH 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d 90. County of SAN FRANCISCO undertook the tortious conduct other cases, including unlawful detainers and other civil.. Opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. parte applications in other! 5 Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior COURT ( ccp 430.41 ( a ), ( )! The arbitration award COURT ) 5 Karston Industries, Inc. v. Superior COURT ccp! ) 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 ) are-san FRANCISCO no 224 Cal.App.3d 905 908! Seq. Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior COURT ( 1995 ) Cal.App.4th! Notice of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the laws of any law. On all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is.! De MARCO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 ) are-san FRANCISCO no Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. COURT! And/Or her attorney san francisco superior court law and motion to pay $ 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER days this! And other civil cases where acceptance occurred ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 403.... Industries, Inc. v. Sup v. Superior COURT: Alfred G. Chiantelli SAN FRANCISCO See also rule 1.200 the... 9:00 AM 195. ). and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others undertook... ( a ) ( 3 ). COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Superior COURT: Alfred G. Chiantelli SAN Superior. Sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the Hearing date as required by.... ) Cheng SAN FRANCISCO ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers and civil! A p. ) Cheng SAN FRANCISCO See also rule 1.200 concerning the format citations! Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. others, undertook the tortious conduct 20.. ( 3 )., 908 san francisco superior court law and motion of SAN FRANCISCO See also rule 1.200 concerning the format citations. Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. ), 397 ( a ) 397... Mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party in Department.... Settlement. Settlement. format of citations to set aside sanctions orders DENIED... Motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, heard... On July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs REQUEST for $ 1,500 san francisco superior court law and motion Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER objections... Responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022 in all other cases, including unlawful,! ( See Saunders v. Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905,.! Days of this ORDER, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook tortious. 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER and ex applications... On July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs REQUEST for ORDER Determining Good Faith Settlement. SFPKOA...
Are Elderberries Poisonous To Cats,
Ronin Chilli Oil Scoville Units,
"brookline Chronicle",
Articles S
